f2fs: Fix use of number of devices
For a single device mount using a zoned block device, the zone
information for the device is stored in the sbi->devs single entry
array and sbi->s_ndevs is set to 1. This differs from a single device
mount using a regular block device which does not allocate sbi->devs
and sets sbi->s_ndevs to 0.
However, sbi->s_devs == 0 condition is used throughout the code to
differentiate a single device mount from a multi-device mount where
sbi->s_ndevs is always larger than 1. This results in problems with
single zoned block device volumes as these are treated as multi-device
mounts but do not have the start_blk and end_blk information set. One
of the problem observed is skipping of zone discard issuing resulting in
write commands being issued to full zones or unaligned to a zone write
pointer.
Fix this problem by simply treating the cases sbi->s_ndevs == 0 (single
regular block device mount) and sbi->s_ndevs == 1 (single zoned block
device mount) in the same manner. This is done by introducing the
helper function f2fs_is_multi_device() and using this helper in place
of direct tests of sbi->s_ndevs value, improving code readability.
Fixes: 7bb3a371d199 ("f2fs: Fix zoned block device support")
Cc: <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index aa7fe79..ddfa2eb7 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int submit_flush_wait(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
int ret = 0;
int i;
- if (!sbi->s_ndevs)
+ if (!f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi))
return __submit_flush_wait(sbi, sbi->sb->s_bdev);
for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
@@ -648,7 +648,8 @@ int f2fs_issue_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino)
return ret;
}
- if (atomic_inc_return(&fcc->queued_flush) == 1 || sbi->s_ndevs > 1) {
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&fcc->queued_flush) == 1 ||
+ f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
ret = submit_flush_wait(sbi, ino);
atomic_dec(&fcc->queued_flush);
@@ -754,7 +755,7 @@ int f2fs_flush_device_cache(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
{
int ret = 0, i;
- if (!sbi->s_ndevs)
+ if (!f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi))
return 0;
for (i = 1; i < sbi->s_ndevs; i++) {
@@ -1369,7 +1370,7 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
trace_f2fs_queue_discard(bdev, blkstart, blklen);
- if (sbi->s_ndevs) {
+ if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
int devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart);
blkstart -= FDEV(devi).start_blk;
@@ -1732,7 +1733,7 @@ static int __f2fs_issue_discard_zone(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
block_t lblkstart = blkstart;
int devi = 0;
- if (sbi->s_ndevs) {
+ if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
devi = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkstart);
blkstart -= FDEV(devi).start_blk;
}
@@ -3089,7 +3090,7 @@ static void update_device_state(struct f2fs_io_info *fio)
struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = fio->sbi;
unsigned int devidx;
- if (!sbi->s_ndevs)
+ if (!f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi))
return;
devidx = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, fio->new_blkaddr);
