Google Git
Sign in
android / kernel / common / 64ae312b4f1c9a7cd6e155ecfcf9e6313e6c28e5
commit64ae312b4f1c9a7cd6e155ecfcf9e6313e6c28e5[log] [tgz]
authorJens Axboe <[email protected]>Sat Jan 21 12:36:08 2023 -0700
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>Wed Mar 01 17:51:46 2023 +0000
treecd2144205951a19911aee70a10e92a4cba148733
parentf632f77487f0f0d0efbb7ac3b97d30bd46edf7f7 [diff]
UPSTREAM: io_uring: ensure that cached task references are always put on exit

commit e775f93f2ab976a2cdb4a7b53063cbe890904f73 upstream.

io_uring caches task references to avoid doing atomics for each of them
per request. If a request is put from the same task that allocated it,
then we can maintain a per-ctx cache of them. This obviously relies
on io_uring always pruning caches in a reliable way, and there's
currently a case off io_uring fd release where we can miss that.

One example is a ring setup with IOPOLL, which relies on the task
polling for completions, which will free them. However, if such a task
submits a request and then exits or closes the ring without reaping
the completion, then ring release will reap and put. If release happens
from that very same task, the completed request task refs will get
put back into the cache pool. This is problematic, as we're now beyond
the point of pruning caches.

Manually drop these caches after doing an IOPOLL reap. This releases
references from the current task, which is enough. If another task
happens to be doing the release, then the caching will not be
triggered and there's no issue.

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: e98e49b2bbf7 ("io_uring: extend task put optimisations")
Reported-by: Homin Rhee <[email protected]>
Change-Id: I9495121af065424141fa9c39840ab9aa91f45c72
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Bug: 268174392
(cherry picked from commit e9c6556708d3b1f77f1a9e08881f8bb01e98e919)
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
1 file changed
tree: cd2144205951a19911aee70a10e92a4cba148733
  1. android/
  2. arch/
  3. block/
  4. certs/
  5. crypto/
  6. Documentation/
  7. drivers/
  8. fs/
  9. include/
  10. init/
  11. io_uring/
  12. ipc/
  13. kernel/
  14. lib/
  15. LICENSES/
  16. mm/
  17. net/
  18. samples/
  19. scripts/
  20. security/
  21. sound/
  22. tools/
  23. usr/
  24. virt/
  25. .clang-format
  26. .cocciconfig
  27. .get_maintainer.ignore
  28. .gitattributes
  29. .gitignore
  30. .mailmap
  31. BUILD.bazel
  32. build.config.aarch64
  33. build.config.allmodconfig
  34. build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64
  35. build.config.allmodconfig.arm
  36. build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64
  37. build.config.amlogic
  38. build.config.arm
  39. build.config.common
  40. build.config.constants
  41. build.config.db845c
  42. build.config.gki
  43. build.config.gki-debug.aarch64
  44. build.config.gki-debug.x86_64
  45. build.config.gki.aarch64
  46. build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140
  47. build.config.gki.x86_64
  48. build.config.gki_kasan
  49. build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64
  50. build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64
  51. build.config.gki_kprobes
  52. build.config.gki_kprobes.aarch64
  53. build.config.gki_kprobes.x86_64
  54. build.config.hikey960
  55. build.config.khwasan
  56. build.config.rockchip
  57. build.config.rockpi4
  58. build.config.x86_64
  59. COPYING
  60. CREDITS
  61. Kbuild
  62. Kconfig
  63. MAINTAINERS
  64. Makefile
  65. OWNERS
  66. README
  67. README.md
README.md

How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels

  1. BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

    • Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux, additions of EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export.
    • When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.

  2. LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with [email protected]. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.

Common Kernel patch requirements

  • All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass script/checkpatch.pl
  • Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
  • If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:, FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:, or ANDROID:.
  • All patches must have a Change-Id: tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html)
  • If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a Bug: tag.
  • All patches must have a Signed-off-by: tag by the author and the submitter

Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type

Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:

  • If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
    • tag the patch subject with UPSTREAM:.
    • add upstream commit information with a (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
      • if the upstream commit message is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <[email protected]>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <[email protected]>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <[email protected]>
  • If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with BACKPORT: instead of UPSTREAM:.
    • use the same tags as UPSTREAM:
    • add comments about the changes under the (cherry picked from commit ...) line
    • Example:
        BACKPORT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <[email protected]>

        Bug: 135791357
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        (cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
        [joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <[email protected]>

Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,

  • If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet been merged into Linux mainline
    • tag the patch subject with FROMGIT:
    • add info on where the patch came from as (cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't use linux-next for example).
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
    • Example:
      • if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
        important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <[email protected]>
  • then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
        FROMGIT: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <[email protected]>

        Bug: 135791357
        (cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
         https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <[email protected]>
  • If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
    • tag the patch subject with FROMLIST:
    • add a Link: tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree)
    • if changes were required, use BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
    • Example:
        FROMLIST: important patch from upstream

        This is the detailed description of the important patch

        Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <[email protected]>

        Bug: 135791357
        Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <[email protected]>

Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:

  • If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Fixes: tag that cites the patch with the bug
    • Example:
        ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c

        This is the detailed description of the important fix

        Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
        Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
        Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <[email protected]>
  • If the patch is a new feature
    • tag the patch subject with ANDROID:
    • add a Bug: tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)