mm/swapfile.c: use swap_count() in swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()
In swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), to identify whether there's any page
table mapping for a 4k sized swap entry, "si->swap_map[i] !=
SWAP_HAS_CACHE" is used. This works correctly now, because all users of
the function will only call it after checking SWAP_HAS_CACHE. But as
pointed out by Daniel, it is better to use "swap_count(map[i])" here,
because it works for "map[i] == 0" case too.
And this makes the implementation more consistent between normal and
huge swap entry.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
Suggested-and-reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Shaohua Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 618358a..c291400 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1429,12 +1429,12 @@ static bool swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(struct swap_info_struct *si,
ci = lock_cluster_or_swap_info(si, offset);
if (!ci || !cluster_is_huge(ci)) {
- if (map[roffset] != SWAP_HAS_CACHE)
+ if (swap_count(map[roffset]))
ret = true;
goto unlock_out;
}
for (i = 0; i < SWAPFILE_CLUSTER; i++) {
- if (map[offset + i] != SWAP_HAS_CACHE) {
+ if (swap_count(map[offset + i])) {
ret = true;
break;
}
