ACPI: processor: Export function to claim _CST control
The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently
and it will need to notify the platform firmware of that if
acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control is set, so add a routine for this purpose,
acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(), to acpi_processor.c (so that it
is always present which is required by intel_idle) and export it
to allow the ACPI processor driver (which is modular) to call it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index 2c4dda0..8a53f3c5 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -705,3 +705,28 @@ void __init acpi_processor_init(void)
acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(&processor_handler, "processor");
acpi_scan_add_handler(&processor_container_handler);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
+/**
+ * acpi_processor_claim_cst_control - Request _CST control from the platform.
+ */
+bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void)
+{
+ static bool cst_control_claimed;
+ acpi_status status;
+
+ if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control || cst_control_claimed)
+ return true;
+
+ status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
+ acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control, 8);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ pr_warn("ACPI: Failed to claim processor _CST control\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ cst_control_claimed = true;
+ return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_claim_cst_control);
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE */
