UPSTREAM: psi: pressure stall information for CPU, memory, and IO
When systems are overcommitted and resources become contended, it's hard
to tell exactly the impact this has on workload productivity, or how close
the system is to lockups and OOM kills. In particular, when machines work
multiple jobs concurrently, the impact of overcommit in terms of latency
and throughput on the individual job can be enormous.
In order to maximize hardware utilization without sacrificing individual
job health or risk complete machine lockups, this patch implements a way
to quantify resource pressure in the system.
A kernel built with CONFIG_PSI=y creates files in /proc/pressure/ that
expose the percentage of time the system is stalled on CPU, memory, or IO,
respectively. Stall states are aggregate versions of the per-task delay
accounting delays:
cpu: some tasks are runnable but not executing on a CPU
memory: tasks are reclaiming, or waiting for swapin or thrashing cache
io: tasks are waiting for io completions
These percentages of walltime can be thought of as pressure percentages,
and they give a general sense of system health and productivity loss
incurred by resource overcommit. They can also indicate when the system
is approaching lockup scenarios and OOMs.
To do this, psi keeps track of the task states associated with each CPU
and samples the time they spend in stall states. Every 2 seconds, the
samples are averaged across CPUs - weighted by the CPUs' non-idle time to
eliminate artifacts from unused CPUs - and translated into percentages of
walltime. A running average of those percentages is maintained over 10s,
1m, and 5m periods (similar to the loadaverage).
[[email protected]: doc fixlet, per Randy]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[[email protected]: code optimization]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[[email protected]: rename psi_clock() to psi_update_work(), per Peter]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[[email protected]: fix build]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Enderborg <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit eb414681d5a07d28d2ff90dc05f69ec6b232ebd2)
Bug: 127712811
Test: lmkd in PSI mode
Change-Id: Id00d23c977169b0c4636d92016fc1fee0274be05
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index e95f32d..b6f7306 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/lockdep.h>
#include <linux/nmi.h>
+#include <linux/psi.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -3582,15 +3583,20 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
enum compact_priority prio, enum compact_result *compact_result)
{
struct page *page;
+ unsigned long pflags;
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
if (!order)
return NULL;
+ psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
+
*compact_result = try_to_compact_pages(gfp_mask, order, alloc_flags, ac,
prio);
+
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
+ psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
if (*compact_result <= COMPACT_INACTIVE)
return NULL;
@@ -3789,11 +3795,13 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
int progress;
unsigned int noreclaim_flag;
+ unsigned long pflags;
cond_resched();
/* We now go into synchronous reclaim */
cpuset_memory_pressure_bump();
+ psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
fs_reclaim_acquire(gfp_mask);
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
@@ -3805,6 +3813,7 @@ __perform_reclaim(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
current->reclaim_state = NULL;
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
fs_reclaim_release(gfp_mask);
+ psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
cond_resched();
