This tool shows the differences between two Android-
target.mk
makefile. This makefile contains information about the Soong build graph that is exposed to Make (Android.mk) and packaging rules.
# run product config $ lunch ${target} # run soong for reference build $ m nothing && cp out/soong/Android-${target}.mk Android-${target}.mk.ref # apply your local changes.. $ m nothing && cp out/soong/Android-${target}.mk Android-${target}.mk.new # compare! $ GOWORK=$PWD/build/bazel/mkcompare/go.work go run android/bazel/mkcompare/cmd \ -json \ Android-${target}.mk.ref \ Android-${target}.mk.new > ${target}.mk.json
The comparator optionally:
-json
). This option turns off all out output.-m N
)--ignore_variables=VAR,...
)--show_module_diffs
)--show_type_modules
)We assume that both makefiles were generated for the same configuration (i.e., the same target value, and our goal is thus to find out the difference that a change contributes to the Makefile interface between Soong and Make.
Currently, the comparator inspects only the module sections of a file.
A module section looks something like this:
include $(CLEAR_VARS) # <module type> LOCAL_MODULE := mymod LOCAL_MODULE_CLASS := ETC include $(BUILD_PREBUILT)
i.e., it always starts with include $(CLEAR_VARS)
(‘module header’) line and spans until the blank line. Before a blank line there is an include <mkfile>
line (‘module footer’), which may be followed by a few extra variable assignments. Between those two include
lines are the assignment lines.
The name of the module is synthesized from the value of the LOCAL_MODULE
variable and target configuration, e.g, apex_tzdata.com.android.tzdata|cls:ETC|target_arch:arm64
or aac_dec_fuzzer|cls:EXECUTABLES|host_arch:x86_64
The module header includes the module type as a comment (the plan was to use the mkfile on the footer line, but it proved to be common to most of the modules, so Soong was modified to provide a module detailed module type as a comment on the header line).
A module section in the reference file is compared with the identically named module section of our file. The following items are compared:
The default outputs look as follows:
159 missing modules, by type: apex.apexBundle.files (159 modules) Missing variables (14): ... LOCAL_REQUIRED_MODULES, by type: art_cc_library (2 modules) art_cc_library_static (4 modules) cc_library (28 modules) cc_library_shared (2 modules) LOCAL_SHARED_LIBRARIES, by type: art_cc_library (60 modules) .... Extra variables (7): LOCAL_EXPORT_CFLAGS, by type: cc_library (4 modules) LOCAL_EXPORT_C_INCLUDE_DEPS, by type: art_cc_library (28 modules) ... Diff variables: (18) LOCAL_EXPORT_C_INCLUDE_DEPS, by type: aidl_interface.go_android/soong/aidl.wrapLibraryFactory.func1__topDownMutatorModule (1721 modules) art_cc_library (12 modules) LOCAL_PREBUILT_MODULE_FILE, by type: apex.apexBundle (7 modules) apex.apexBundle.files (625 modules) ...
It looks like this:
{ "RefPath": "<...>/out/soong/Android-aosp_arm64.mk", "OurPath": "<...>/out.mixed/soong/Android-aosp_arm64.mk", "MissingModules": [ "adbd.com.android.adbd|cls:EXECUTABLES|target_arch:arm64", "android.hardware.common-V2-ndk.com.android.media.swcodec|cls:SHARED_LIBRARIES|target_arch:arm64", "android.hardware.graphics.allocator-V1-ndk.com.android.media.swcodec|cls:SHARED_LIBRARIES|target_arch:arm64", "android.hardware.graphics.allocator@2.0.com.android.media.swcodec|cls:SHARED_LIBRARIES|target_arch:arm64", ... ], "DiffModules": [ { "Name": "_makenames|cls:EXECUTABLES|target_arch:arm64", "RefLocation": 137674, "OurLocation": 137673, "MissingVars": [ "LOCAL_SHARED_LIBRARIES", "LOCAL_STATIC_LIBRARIES" ], "DiffVars": [ { "Name": "LOCAL_PREBUILT_MODULE_FILE", "MissingItems": [ "out/soong/.intermediates/external/libcap/_makenames/android_arm64_armv8-a/_makenames" ], "ExtraItems": [ "out/bazel-bin/external/libcap/_makenames" ] }, { "Name": "LOCAL_SOONG_UNSTRIPPED_BINARY", "MissingItems": [ "out/soong/.intermediates/external/libcap/_makenames/android_arm64_armv8-a/unstripped/_makenames" ], "ExtraItems": [ "out/bazel-bin/external/libcap/_makenames_unstripped" ] } ] }, ... ] }
Use JSON query tool like jq
to slice and dice it.