| c-ares security |
| =============== |
| |
| This document is intended to provide guidance on how security vulnerabilities |
| should be handled in the c-ares project. |
| |
| Publishing Information |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| All known and public c-ares vulnerabilities will be listed on [the c-ares web |
| site](https://c-ares.org/vulns.html). |
| |
| Security vulnerabilities should not be entered in the project's public bug |
| tracker unless the necessary configuration is in place to limit access to the |
| issue to only the reporter and the project's security team. |
| |
| Vulnerability Handling |
| ---------------------- |
| |
| The typical process for handling a new security vulnerability is as follows. |
| |
| No information should be made public about a vulnerability until it is |
| formally announced at the end of this process. That means, for example that a |
| bug tracker entry must NOT be created to track the issue since that will make |
| the issue public and it should not be discussed on the project's public |
| mailing list. Also messages associated with any commits should not make any |
| reference to the security nature of the commit if done prior to the public |
| announcement. |
| |
| - The person discovering the issue, the reporter, reports the vulnerability |
| privately to `[email protected]`. That's an email alias that reaches a |
| handful of selected and trusted people. |
| |
| - Messages that do not relate to the reporting or managing of an undisclosed |
| security vulnerability in c-ares are ignored and no further action is |
| required. |
| |
| - A person in the security team sends an e-mail to the original reporter to |
| acknowledge the report. |
| |
| - The security team investigates the report and either rejects it or accepts |
| it. |
| |
| - If the report is rejected, the team writes to the reporter to explain why. |
| |
| - If the report is accepted, the team writes to the reporter to let him/her |
| know it is accepted and that they are working on a fix. |
| |
| - The security team discusses the problem, works out a fix, considers the |
| impact of the problem and suggests a release schedule. This discussion |
| should involve the reporter as much as possible. |
| |
| - The release of the information should be "as soon as possible" and is most |
| often synced with an upcoming release that contains the fix. If the |
| reporter, or anyone else, thinks the next planned release is too far away |
| then a separate earlier release for security reasons should be considered. |
| |
| - Write a security advisory draft about the problem that explains what the |
| problem is, its impact, which versions it affects, solutions or |
| workarounds, when the release is out and make sure to credit all |
| contributors properly. |
| |
| - Request a CVE number from |
| [distros@openwall](http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros) |
| when also informing and preparing them for the upcoming public security |
| vulnerability announcement - attach the advisory draft for information. Note |
| that 'distros' won't accept an embargo longer than 19 days. |
| |
| - Update the "security advisory" with the CVE number. |
| |
| - The security team commits the fix in a private branch. The commit message |
| should ideally contain the CVE number. This fix is usually also distributed |
| to the 'distros' mailing list to allow them to use the fix prior to the |
| public announcement. |
| |
| - At the day of the next release, the private branch is merged into the master |
| branch and pushed. Once pushed, the information is accessible to the public |
| and the actual release should follow suit immediately afterwards. |
| |
| - The project team creates a release that includes the fix. |
| |
| - The project team announces the release and the vulnerability to the world in |
| the same manner we always announce releases. It gets sent to the c-ares |
| mailing list and the oss-security mailing list. |
| |
| - The security web page on the web site should get the new vulnerability |
| mentioned. |
| |
| C-ARES-SECURITY (at haxx dot se) |
| -------------------------------- |
| |
| Who is on this list? There are a couple of criteria you must meet, and then we |
| might ask you to join the list or you can ask to join it. It really isn't very |
| formal. We basically only require that you have a long-term presence in the |
| c-ares project and you have shown an understanding for the project and its way |
| of working. You must've been around for a good while and you should have no |
| plans in vanishing in the near future. |
| |
| We do not make the list of partipants public mostly because it tends to vary |
| somewhat over time and a list somewhere will only risk getting outdated. |