| fonts-indic |
| Current Version :- 2.4.3 |
| * Wed Sep 09 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute@redhat.com> - 2.4.3 |
| - updated conf file for all language |
| - added changelog for individual lang |
| - modified makedist.sh generate.sh for releasing new tarballs |
| |
| * Fri Aug 28 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute@redhat.com> - 2.4.2 |
| - added conf file for all fonts |
| - contributions from Parag Nemade <pnemade@redhat.com> for conf files |
| |
| * Wed Aug 12 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute@redhat.com> - 2.4.1 |
| - Update Copyright |
| |
| * Tue Aug 04 2009 Pravin Satpute <psatpute@redhat.com> - 2.4.0 |
| - Added Unicode 5.1 support in All Lohit fonts |
| |
| * Thu Mar 05 2009 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.3.8 |
| - Bug 428427 - [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering |
| - Bug 450699 - [ta_IN]Errors in "sh" and "shrI" in Lohit Tamil font (fixed in font, needs rendering update) |
| - Bug 476427 - [te_IN] - Consonant+Virama+Consonant+Virama+space renders the second virama as a separate glyph in lohit-telugu font |
| - Bug 479100 - [kn_IN] Conjunct combination of U0C9D with U0CCA/U0CCB is rendering wrongly |
| - Bug 483530 - [bn_IN]Lohit Bengali font cheating about character support |
| - Added Lohit-Assamese |
| - Modified README file. |
| |
| * Tue Sep 09 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.3.1 |
| - Bug 216400: [te_IN] - Anaconda GUI - Release Notes button is overlapping |
| with other texts in a specific page |
| |
| * Wed Aug 20 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.3.0 |
| - Bug 215902: [hi_IN, mr_IN]Incorrect extent of 0x093f when attached to a composite character which has width greater than a single character (hi_IN & maybe others) |
| - Forked Lohit Hindi into Marathi, Maithili, Kashmiri, Konkani, Sindhi and Nepali. |
| |
| * Fri Jun 06 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> |
| - Bug 445176: [ml_IN] Conjuncts combining with 0D30 do not form the pre based glyph |
| |
| * Fri Jun 06 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> |
| - Improved Anchoring(blwm Anchor-0) for Hindi font. |
| - Corrected positioning of U+0953 for Hindi font. |
| |
| * Tue Apr 29 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.2.1 |
| - Resolved bugs (bugzilla.redhat.com): |
| - Bug 444559 Processed: [ml_IN] Wrong shape for conjuncts formed using 0D30 |
| (xRa) in a word |
| - Bug 444561 Processed: [ml_IN] Conjuncts does not get combined with 0D30 to |
| form the pre based glyph |
| - Bug 444563: [ml_IN] When 0D2F is combined with a consonant and followed by |
| 0D15, 0D2F joins with 0D15 |
| |
| * Tue Apr 08 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.2.0 |
| - Resolved bugs (bugzilla.redhat.com): |
| - Bug 202400: [hi_IN] New codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.0 |
| - Bug 205981: [hi_IN]The font file of Devanagari(lohit_hi.ttf) lacks the glyph |
| of U+0x0904 |
| - Bug 206426: [hi_IN, mr_IN] Some Glyphs are missing and some GPOS shapes |
| should be more perfect - Priority - C |
| - Bug 239630: [hi_IN] the glyph of 0x0953 in lohit_hi.ttf is wrong. |
| - Bug 428427: [kn_IN][fonts-indic] - 0CB5+0CCA is wrongly rendering |
| |
| * Thu Feb 28 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.1.9 |
| - Resolved bugs(bugzilla.redhat.com): |
| - Bug 431035: [ml_IN] Glyph to be formed for nine consonants + 0D4D + 0D32 |
| - Bug 433437: [ml_IN] Rendering combination incorrect with 0D35 |
| - Bug 433440: [ml_IN] Rendering combination incorrect with 0D2F |
| - Contributions from Hiran Venugopalan (xRa glyphs and few other) |
| |
| * Fri Jan 25 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.1.8 |
| - Bug 192812: [ml_IN]GPOS issues in new Malayalam font |
| - Bug 402321: [ml_IN} Wrong combinations used for the conjunct 'ന്പ' |
| - Bug 402331: [ml_IN] Wrong combinations used for conjunct 'ന്റ' |
| - Bug 424701: [ml_IN] words are shown joined (very low space shown on screen) |
| - Bug 429526: [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file |
| - Bug 247233: Additional special character rendering for assamese [as-IN] and bengali [bn-IN] |
| |
| * Tue Jan 15 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.1.7 |
| - Updated the makedist.sh script |
| |
| * Tue Jan 15 2008 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera@redhat.com> - 2.1.7 |
| - Bug 233419: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel are |
| not rendering correctly |
| |
| * Fri Dec 14 2007 Rahul Bhalerao <[email protected]> - 2.1.6 |
| - Bug 234284: [pa_IN] Enlarge size for asterik(*) |
| |
| * Mon Mar 26 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.5 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 231965: [kn_IN] wrong Conjuct combines during the formation kannada letter [yo] |
| - Bug 233257: [kn_IN] Conjuct combination of U0CAE with U0CCB is rendering wrongly |
| - Bug 233415: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel are not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233554: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC0 are not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233555: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC7 are not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233556: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC6 are not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233557: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CC8 are not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233558: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CCBare not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233559: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CBE are not rendering correctly |
| - Bug 233560: [kn_IN] GSUB's combinaing with additional dependent vowel U0CBF are not rendering correctly |
| |
| * Mon Mar 05 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.4 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 221383: [kn_IN] GSUB combinations has problem with Ra |
| |
| * Mon Feb 19 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.3 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 202401: [ta_IN] New codepoints/glyphs in Unicode 5.0 |
| - Bug 223774: [kn_IN] Some Ligature rules are wrong in the font file |
| - Bug 223971: [kn_IN] Consonant + Halant + Consonant + Dependent Vowel not appearing properly in some rare cases |
| - Bug 227971: [kn_IN] Combinations with 2 Halants not rendering properly |
| |
| * Tue Jan 16 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.2 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 222407: [or_IN] [fonts-indic] - One GSUB Conjunct is not appearing with its correct shape |
| - Bug 206434: [ml_IN] Digits are appearing in English instead of malayalam - Priority C |
| - Bug 215894: Relative height of 0x0901 (and 0x0902) on 0x0915 is different than other devnagari characters (hi_IN, mr_IN) |
| - Bug 222408: [te_IN] [fonts-indic] - Danda and Double Danda to be implemented with 0964 && 0965 |
| - Bug 222409: [kn_IN] [fonts-indic] - Danda and Double Danda to be implemented with 0964 && 0965 |
| - Bug 221384: [kn_IN] - shape of ra (U+0CB0) is not corret in combined character (below base) |
| |
| * Tue Jan 16 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.1.1 |
| - Added makedist.sh, generate.sh and generate.pe script files. |
| |
| * Fri Jan 12 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.13 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 220880: [or_IN] Danda need to move from 0B64/0B65 to 0964/0965 |
| - Bug 222406: [ml_IN] Danda need to move from 0D64/0D65 to 0964/0965 |
| |
| * Wed Jan 02 2007 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.12 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 220881: [ta_IN] [fonts-tamil] - Warning showing in the terminal when run apps with ta_IN locale |
| - Bug 220882: [hi_IN] rendering problem for number "5" in postscript file |
| |
| * Wed Dec 13 2006 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.11 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 216639: [kn_IN] OTF rules to be fixed - Priority A |
| - Bug 217482: [kn_IN] - pango - Composed Char not rendered properly |
| - Bug 219583: [pa_IN] Punjabi fonts' size is big as compared to English |
| - Bug 218588: [gu_IN] Qt doesn't display virama properly |
| |
| * Tue Dec 06 2006 Parag Nemade <[email protected]> - 2.0.10 |
| - Resolved Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 207269: [ta_IN] - Some conjunct characters not appearing with proper shape - Priority - B |
| - Bug 217482: [kn_IN] - pango - Composed Char not rendered properly |
| - Bug 216628: [ml] characters are not shown bold during selecting BOLD font |
| - Bug 218588: [gu_IN] Qt doesn't display virama properly |
| - Bug 206599: [te_IN] - Some of the Priority - C GSUB Conjuncts are not appearing with its actual shape |
| - Resolved Bugs from LingNing Zhang |
| - Bug 218586: [ml_IN] 0d2f+0d4d combination is invaild when put in word |
| - Bug 218587: [ml_IN] 0d35+0d4d combination is invaild (should not combine) |
| |
| * Tue Nov 21 2006 Parag Nemade <pnemade@redhat.com> - 2.0.9 |
| - Fixed Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 216060: [pa_IN]Lohit Punjabi: (U+0A03) Gurmukhi Sign Visarga right margin is too wide. |
| |
| * Tue Nov 21 2006 Parag Nemade <pnemade@redhat.com> - 2.0.8 |
| - Fixed Bugs from Parag Nemade |
| - Bug 216629 : [te_IN] GPOS position should be at middle instead of left hand side - Priority B |
| - Bug 216631 : [or_IN] one GSUB Rule is wrongly defined - Priority A |
| - Bug 216628 : [ml] characters are not shown bold during selecting BOLD font |
| - Bug 216624 : [pa_IN] 0a01/0a03/0964/0965 is missing from font |
| - Bug 216634 : Glyphs for two combinations are wrong in Gujarati (gu_IN) |
| - Bug 197216 : [bn_IN]Incorrect glyph for conjunct |
| - Bug 215894 : Relative height of 0x0901 (and 0x0902) on 0x0915 is different than |
| other devnagari characters (hi_IN, mr_IN) |
| - Fixed Bugs from LingNing Zhang |
| - Bug 216626 : [as_IN] Pango - A particular char when Conjuncts, creates Cursor Nevigation Problem |
| - Bug 216627 : [ml_IN] The glyph of 0x25CC is not existing in lohit_ml.ttf |
| - Bug 216639 : [kn_IN] OTF rules to be fixed - Priority A |
| |
| * Tue 17 oct 2006 Leon Ho <llch@redhat.com> - 2.0.7 |
| - Bug 206601: [ta_IN] Glyph is missing for Unicode U+0BB6 - Priority - A (Rahul Bhalerao) |
| - Bug 216639: [kn_IN] OTF rules to be fixed - Priority A (Ramakrishna Reddy) |
| |
| * Fri 29 Sep 2006 Leon Ho <llch@redhat.com> - 2.0.6 |
| - Bug 208525: [ml_IN]the glyph of 0d33+0d4d+0d33 is wrong (LingNing Zhang) |
| - Bug 208540: [ml_IN]the glyph of 0d2f+0d4d and the glyph of 0d2f+0d4d+0d2f are wrong (LingNing Zhang) |
