|  | 
 | On atomic bitops. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | While our bitmap_{}() functions are non-atomic, we have a number of operations | 
 | operating on single bits in a bitmap that are atomic. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | API | 
 | --- | 
 |  | 
 | The single bit operations are: | 
 |  | 
 | Non-RMW ops: | 
 |  | 
 |   test_bit() | 
 |  | 
 | RMW atomic operations without return value: | 
 |  | 
 |   {set,clear,change}_bit() | 
 |   clear_bit_unlock() | 
 |  | 
 | RMW atomic operations with return value: | 
 |  | 
 |   test_and_{set,clear,change}_bit() | 
 |   test_and_set_bit_lock() | 
 |  | 
 | Barriers: | 
 |  | 
 |   smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic() | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | All RMW atomic operations have a '__' prefixed variant which is non-atomic. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | SEMANTICS | 
 | --------- | 
 |  | 
 | Non-atomic ops: | 
 |  | 
 | In particular __clear_bit_unlock() suffers the same issue as atomic_set(), | 
 | which is why the generic version maps to clear_bit_unlock(), see atomic_t.txt. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | RMW ops: | 
 |  | 
 | The test_and_{}_bit() operations return the original value of the bit. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | ORDERING | 
 | -------- | 
 |  | 
 | Like with atomic_t, the rule of thumb is: | 
 |  | 
 |  - non-RMW operations are unordered; | 
 |  | 
 |  - RMW operations that have no return value are unordered; | 
 |  | 
 |  - RMW operations that have a return value are fully ordered. | 
 |  | 
 |  - RMW operations that are conditional are unordered on FAILURE, | 
 |    otherwise the above rules apply. In the case of test_and_{}_bit() operations, | 
 |    if the bit in memory is unchanged by the operation then it is deemed to have | 
 |    failed. | 
 |  | 
 | Except for a successful test_and_set_bit_lock() which has ACQUIRE semantics and | 
 | clear_bit_unlock() which has RELEASE semantics. | 
 |  | 
 | Since a platform only has a single means of achieving atomic operations | 
 | the same barriers as for atomic_t are used, see atomic_t.txt. | 
 |  |