blob: f82f41daacc1fe6082c6ab75e92d0538e4966e58 [file] [log] [blame]
//! Instruction predicates/properties, shared by various analyses.
use crate::ir::immediates::Offset32;
use crate::ir::{self, Block, DataFlowGraph, Function, Inst, InstructionData, Opcode, Type, Value};
use cranelift_entity::EntityRef;
/// Preserve instructions with used result values.
pub fn any_inst_results_used(inst: Inst, live: &[bool], dfg: &DataFlowGraph) -> bool {
dfg.inst_results(inst).iter().any(|v| live[v.index()])
}
/// Test whether the given opcode is unsafe to even consider as side-effect-free.
#[inline(always)]
fn trivially_has_side_effects(opcode: Opcode) -> bool {
opcode.is_call()
|| opcode.is_branch()
|| opcode.is_terminator()
|| opcode.is_return()
|| opcode.can_trap()
|| opcode.other_side_effects()
|| opcode.can_store()
}
/// Load instructions without the `notrap` flag are defined to trap when
/// operating on inaccessible memory, so we can't treat them as side-effect-free even if the loaded
/// value is unused.
#[inline(always)]
fn is_load_with_defined_trapping(opcode: Opcode, data: &InstructionData) -> bool {
if !opcode.can_load() {
return false;
}
match *data {
InstructionData::StackLoad { .. } => false,
InstructionData::Load { flags, .. } => !flags.notrap(),
_ => true,
}
}
/// Does the given instruction have any side-effect that would preclude it from being removed when
/// its value is unused?
#[inline(always)]
pub fn has_side_effect(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> bool {
let data = &func.dfg.insts[inst];
let opcode = data.opcode();
trivially_has_side_effects(opcode) || is_load_with_defined_trapping(opcode, data)
}
/// Does the given instruction behave as a "pure" node with respect to
/// aegraph semantics?
///
/// - Actual pure nodes (arithmetic, etc)
/// - Loads with the `readonly` flag set
pub fn is_pure_for_egraph(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> bool {
let is_readonly_load = match func.dfg.insts[inst] {
InstructionData::Load {
opcode: Opcode::Load,
flags,
..
} => flags.readonly() && flags.notrap(),
_ => false,
};
// Multi-value results do not play nicely with much of the egraph
// infrastructure. They are in practice used only for multi-return
// calls and some other odd instructions (e.g. iadd_cout) which,
// for now, we can afford to leave in place as opaque
// side-effecting ops. So if more than one result, then the inst
// is "not pure". Similarly, ops with zero results can be used
// only for their side-effects, so are never pure. (Or if they
// are, we can always trivially eliminate them with no effect.)
let has_one_result = func.dfg.inst_results(inst).len() == 1;
let op = func.dfg.insts[inst].opcode();
has_one_result && (is_readonly_load || (!op.can_load() && !trivially_has_side_effects(op)))
}
/// Can the given instruction be merged into another copy of itself?
/// These instructions may have side-effects, but as long as we retain
/// the first instance of the instruction, the second and further
/// instances are redundant if they would produce the same trap or
/// result.
pub fn is_mergeable_for_egraph(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> bool {
let op = func.dfg.insts[inst].opcode();
// We can only merge one-result operators due to the way that GVN
// is structured in the egraph implementation.
let has_one_result = func.dfg.inst_results(inst).len() == 1;
has_one_result
// Loads/stores are handled by alias analysis and not
// otherwise mergeable.
&& !op.can_load()
&& !op.can_store()
// Can only have idempotent side-effects.
&& (!has_side_effect(func, inst) || op.side_effects_idempotent())
}
/// Does the given instruction have any side-effect as per [has_side_effect], or else is a load,
/// but not the get_pinned_reg opcode?
pub fn has_lowering_side_effect(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> bool {
let op = func.dfg.insts[inst].opcode();
op != Opcode::GetPinnedReg && (has_side_effect(func, inst) || op.can_load())
}
/// Is the given instruction a constant value (`iconst`, `fconst`) that can be
/// represented in 64 bits?
pub fn is_constant_64bit(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> Option<u64> {
let data = &func.dfg.insts[inst];
if data.opcode() == Opcode::Null {
return Some(0);
}
match data {
&InstructionData::UnaryImm { imm, .. } => Some(imm.bits() as u64),
&InstructionData::UnaryIeee32 { imm, .. } => Some(imm.bits() as u64),
&InstructionData::UnaryIeee64 { imm, .. } => Some(imm.bits()),
_ => None,
}
}
/// Get the address, offset, and access type from the given instruction, if any.
pub fn inst_addr_offset_type(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> Option<(Value, Offset32, Type)> {
let data = &func.dfg.insts[inst];
match data {
InstructionData::Load { arg, offset, .. } => {
let ty = func.dfg.value_type(func.dfg.inst_results(inst)[0]);
Some((*arg, *offset, ty))
}
InstructionData::LoadNoOffset { arg, .. } => {
let ty = func.dfg.value_type(func.dfg.inst_results(inst)[0]);
Some((*arg, 0.into(), ty))
}
InstructionData::Store { args, offset, .. } => {
let ty = func.dfg.value_type(args[0]);
Some((args[1], *offset, ty))
}
InstructionData::StoreNoOffset { args, .. } => {
let ty = func.dfg.value_type(args[0]);
Some((args[1], 0.into(), ty))
}
_ => None,
}
}
/// Get the store data, if any, from an instruction.
pub fn inst_store_data(func: &Function, inst: Inst) -> Option<Value> {
let data = &func.dfg.insts[inst];
match data {
InstructionData::Store { args, .. } | InstructionData::StoreNoOffset { args, .. } => {
Some(args[0])
}
_ => None,
}
}
/// Determine whether this opcode behaves as a memory fence, i.e.,
/// prohibits any moving of memory accesses across it.
pub fn has_memory_fence_semantics(op: Opcode) -> bool {
match op {
Opcode::AtomicRmw
| Opcode::AtomicCas
| Opcode::AtomicLoad
| Opcode::AtomicStore
| Opcode::Fence
| Opcode::Debugtrap => true,
Opcode::Call | Opcode::CallIndirect => true,
op if op.can_trap() => true,
_ => false,
}
}
/// Visit all successors of a block with a given visitor closure. The closure
/// arguments are the branch instruction that is used to reach the successor,
/// the successor block itself, and a flag indicating whether the block is
/// branched to via a table entry.
pub(crate) fn visit_block_succs<F: FnMut(Inst, Block, bool)>(
f: &Function,
block: Block,
mut visit: F,
) {
if let Some(inst) = f.layout.last_inst(block) {
match &f.dfg.insts[inst] {
ir::InstructionData::Jump {
destination: dest, ..
} => {
visit(inst, dest.block(&f.dfg.value_lists), false);
}
ir::InstructionData::Brif {
blocks: [block_then, block_else],
..
} => {
visit(inst, block_then.block(&f.dfg.value_lists), false);
visit(inst, block_else.block(&f.dfg.value_lists), false);
}
ir::InstructionData::BranchTable { table, .. } => {
let pool = &f.dfg.value_lists;
let table = &f.stencil.dfg.jump_tables[*table];
// The default block is reached via a direct conditional branch,
// so it is not part of the table. We visit the default block
// first explicitly, to mirror the traversal order of
// `JumpTableData::all_branches`, and transitively the order of
// `InstructionData::branch_destination`.
//
// Additionally, this case is why we are unable to replace this
// whole function with a loop over `branch_destination`: we need
// to report which branch targets come from the table vs the
// default.
visit(inst, table.default_block().block(pool), false);
for dest in table.as_slice() {
visit(inst, dest.block(pool), true);
}
}
inst => debug_assert!(!inst.opcode().is_branch()),
}
}
}